Escalation: A Hylomorphic Interpretation of Quantum Thermodynamics and
Chemistry,” American Catholic
Philosophical Quarterly (forthcoming).
“The Many World Interpretation of Quantum
Mechanics: A Hylomorphic Critique and Alternative,” in Robert C. Koons, William
Simpson, and Nicholas Teh (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian
Perspectives on Modern Science (Routledge, forthcoming).
“Against Emergent Individualism,” in Blackwell Companion to Dualism, J. P.
Moreland, Jonathan Loose, Angus Menuge (eds.), (Wiley-Blackwell, forthcoming).
Table of Contents, The Atlas of Reality: A Comprehensive Guide to Metaphysics (Wiley-Blackwell, 2017).
“Must a Functionalist be an Aristotelian?” with
Alexander R. Pruss, in Causal Powers
Jonathan Jacobs (ed.), (Oxford University Press, 2017).
“The Epistemological and Ontological Superiority of
Hylomorphism,” Synthese doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1295-6
vs. Faint-hearted Hylomorphism: Toward an Aristotelian Account of Composition,” Res Philosophica 91 (2014):1-27.
“Epistemically Vague Boundaries without Margins of
Error,” in On the Sorites Paradox,
Otavio Bueno (ed.), (Springer, 2015).
“Epistemological Problems with Materialism,” in The Waning of Materialism, edited by
Robert C. Koons and George Bealer (Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2010), pp.
Grim Reaper Kalām Argument: From Temporal and Causal Finitism to God,” in The Kalām Argument, William L. Craig and
Paul Copan (eds.), London: Bloomsbury, forthcoming.
“Aristotle, God, and the Quantum,” in Knowing Creation, Andrew Torrance (ed.),
Zondervan Academic, forthcoming.
"The Argument from Intuition," in Two Dozen (or so) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project, eds. Jerry L. Walls and Trent Dougherty (Oxford University Press, expected 2017).
“Divine Persons as Relational Qua Objects,” Religious Studies (forthcoming).
“A New Kalam
Argument: Revenge of the Grim Reaper,” in Philosophical
Theology and the Christian Tradition: Russian and Western Perspectives,
David Bradshaw (ed.) (Washington, DC: Council for Research in Values and
Philosophy, 2012), pp. 107-22
“St. Thomas Aquinas on Intelligent Design,” with
Logan Paul Gage, Proceedings of the
American Catholic Philosophical Association 85 (2011):79-97.
“God’s Existence,” in Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Metaphysics, Daniel D. Novotny and
Lukas Novak (eds.). (Oxford: Routledge, 2013), pp. 247-68.
“Ways Two and Three: Thomas Aquinas on the
Intelligibility of Being,”Epistemological
Foundations for the Cosmological Argument, in: Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Religion, Volume 1, edited by Jonathan Kvanvig (Oxford, 2008).
“Reason and Religion,” in The Routledge Handbook on Contemporary Philosophy of Religion,
edited by Graham Oppy (New York: Routledge, 2015).
"Review of Logic and Theism, by J. Howard Sobel," Faith and Philosophy 23(2006):356-60.
Science and Theism: Concord, not Conflict. In The Rationality
of Theism, edited by Paul Copan and Paul K. Moser, Routledge, 2003.
Dual Agency: A Thomistic Account of Divine Providence and
Human Freedom, Philosophia Christi 4(2002): 397-410.
Defeasible Reasoning, Special Pleading and the Cosmological
Argument (Gifford Conference, University of Aberdeen,
May 25-29, 2000).
The Incompatibility of Naturalism and Scientific Realism. In Naturalism: A Critical Appraisal,
edited by J. P. Moreland and William Lane Craig (Routledge, UK, 2000).
Probability, and Infinite Passion,” Faith
and Philosophy 10:145-160 (April, 1993).
"Can Virtue be Taught? Western Civilization and Moral Formation,"
Civilization and the Academy, Bradley C. S. Watson (ed.) (Rowman &
“The Metaphysics of Property: Relations of
Ownership as Social Practices,” in Eigentum/Private
Property (Soziale Orientierung Band 22), William A. Frank (ed.) (Berlin:
Duncker & Hubmlot, 2013), pp. 73-90.
“The Modest College and the Imperial University,” in The Culture of Immodesty in American Life
and Culture: The Modest Republic,
Michael Federici, Richard Gamble and Mark Mitchell (eds.) (Palgrave Macmillan,
Mills of Miseducation,” Humanitas
The War of the Three Humanisms: Irving Babbitt and the
Revival of Classical Learning
of Intention: A Hylomorphic Critique of the New Natural Law Theory,” with
Matthew B. O’Brien, American Catholic
Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2012): 655-703.
“Eros and Agape Revisited: Reconciling Classical
Eudaemonism with Christian Love,” invited chapter for Political Philosophy and the Claims of Faith, Paul De Hart and
Carson Halloway (eds.) (Northern Illinois University, expected 2013).